The effect of two-temperature post-shock accretion flow on the linear polarization pulse in magnetic cataclysmic variables
Gordon E. Sarty, Curtis J. Saxton, Kinwah Wu

TL;DR
This study compares the polarized radiation from one- and two-temperature models of post-shock accretion flows in magnetic cataclysmic variables, highlighting the importance of two-temperature modeling for accurate polarization predictions.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed analysis of how two-temperature hydrodynamics affects polarization signals in mCVs, emphasizing the need for two-temperature models in polarization studies.
Findings
Two-temperature flows can produce different polarization pulse patterns than one-temperature flows.
Modeling two-temperature flows is crucial for accurate polarization predictions in ultraviolet observations.
Circular polarization predictions are similar between models, but linear polarization pulses differ significantly.
Abstract
The temperatures of electrons and ions in the post-shock accretion region of a magnetic cataclysmic variable (mCV) will be equal at sufficiently high mass flow rates or for sufficiently weak magnetic fields. At lower mass flow rates or in stronger magnetic fields, efficient cyclotron cooling will cool the electrons faster than the electrons can cool the ions and a two-temperature flow will result. Here we investigate the differences in polarized radiation expected from mCV post-shock accretion columns modeled with one- and two-temperature hydrodynamics. In an mCV model with one accretion region, a magnetic field >~30 MG and a specific mass flow rate of ~0.5 g/cm/cm/s, along with a relatively generic geometric orientation of the system, we find that in the ultraviolet either a single linear polarization pulse per binary orbit or two pulses per binary orbit can be expected, depending on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
