The Mass of the Black Hole in the Quasar PG 2130+099
C. J. Grier, B. M. Peterson, M. C. Bentz, K. D. Denney, J. D. Eastman,, M. Dietrich, R. W. Pogge, J. L. Prieto, D. L. DePoy, R. J. Assef, D. W., Atlee, J. Bird, M. E. Eyler, M. S. Peeples, R. Siverd, L. C. Watson, J. C., Yee

TL;DR
This study refines the black hole mass measurement in quasar PG 2130+099 using reverberation mapping, correcting previous inaccuracies caused by data sampling issues and secular variability, and confirms its consistency with established relationships.
Contribution
The paper provides a more accurate black hole mass estimate for PG 2130+099 through improved reverberation mapping analysis, addressing past measurement errors.
Findings
New lag measurement of 22.9 days for H-beta emission.
Black hole mass estimated at approximately 3.8 x 10^7 solar masses.
Revised measurements align PG 2130+099 with known R-L and MBH-Sigma relations.
Abstract
We present the results of a recent reverberation-mapping campaign undertaken to improve measurements of the radius of the broad line region and the central black hole mass of the quasar PG 2130+099. Cross correlation of the 5100 angstrom continuum and H-beta emission-line light curves yields a time lag of 22.9 (+4.4 - 4.3) days, corresponding to a central black hole mass MBH= 3.8 (+/- 1.5) x 10^7 Msun. This value supports the notion that previous measurements yielded an incorrect lag. We re-analyzed previous datasets to investigate the possible sources of the discrepancy and conclude that previous measurement errors were apparently caused by a combination of undersampling of the light curves and long-term secular changes in the H-beta emission-line equivalent width. With our new measurements, PG 2130+099 is no longer an outlier in either the R-L or the MBH-Sigma relationships.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
