Some notable properties of the standard oncology phase I design
Gregory J. Hather, Howard Mackey

TL;DR
This paper explores fundamental properties of the standard 3+3 oncology phase I trial design, revealing its implicit use of isotonic regression, its relation to Bayesian methods, and its behavior in worst-case scenarios.
Contribution
It uncovers the mathematical and statistical properties of the standard design, including its connection to Bayesian approaches and its performance limits.
Findings
Standard design implicitly uses isotonic regression.
A Bayesian design can replicate the standard design with slight modifications.
The standard design's behavior in worst-case scenarios is characterized and compared.
Abstract
We identify three properties of the standard oncology phase I trial design or 3 + 3 design. We show that the standard design implicitly uses isotonic regression to estimate a maximum tolerated dose. We next illustrate the relationship between the standard design and a Bayesian design proposed by Ji et al. (2007). A slight modification to this Bayesian design, under a particular model specification, would assign treatments in a manner identical to the standard design. We finally present calculations revealing the behavior of the standard design in a worst case scenario and compare its behavior with other 3 + 3-like designs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Optimal Experimental Design Methods · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
