Contradiction between strong lensing statistics and a feedback solution to the cusp/core problem
Da-Ming Chen, Stacy McGaugh

TL;DR
This paper examines the contradiction between dark matter halo profiles suggested by rotation curves and those inferred from gravitational lensing, highlighting a tension in baryonic effects on galaxy centers.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of recent rotation curve data and lensing observations, revealing a fundamental conflict in the effects of baryons on galaxy core profiles.
Findings
Lensing data favors cuspy profiles, conflicting with core profiles from rotation curves.
High baryon densities can reconcile lensing with core profiles only if they steepen the mass profile.
There is a contradiction in how baryons are expected to modify galaxy centers.
Abstract
Standard cosmology has many successes on large scales, but faces some fundamental difficulties on small, galactic scales. One such difficulty is the cusp/core problem. High resolution observations of the rotation curves for dark matter dominated low surface brightness (LSB) galaxies imply that galactic dark matter halos have a density profile with a flat central core, whereas N-body structure formation simulations predict a divergent (cuspy) density profile at the center. It has been proposed that this problem can be resolved by stellar feedback driving turbulent gas motion that erases the initial cusp. However, strong gravitational lensing prefers a cuspy density profile for galactic halos. In this paper, we use the most recent high resolution observations of the rotation curves of LSB galaxies to fit the core size as a function of halo mass, and compare the resultant lensing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
