Mergers and Mass Accretion Rates in Galaxy Assembly: The Millennium Simulation Compared to Observations of z~2 Galaxies
S. Genel, R. Genzel, N. Bouch\'e, A. Sternberg, T. Naab, N. M., F\"orster Schreiber, K. L. Shapiro, L. J. Tacconi, D. Lutz, G. Cresci, P., Buschkamp, R. I. Davies, E. K. S. Hicks

TL;DR
This study uses the Millennium Simulation to compare galaxy merger rates and mass accretion with observations at z~2, suggesting secular evolution plays a key role in galaxy development beyond mergers.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed comparison of simulated merger rates and mass accretion with observational data, highlighting the importance of secular evolution in galaxy assembly.
Findings
Mass accretion rates in simulations match observed star formation rates at z~2.
Major mergers account for submillimeter galaxy counts.
Mergers alone cannot explain the evolution of galaxies to z=0.
Abstract
Recent observations of UV-/optically selected, massive star forming galaxies at z~2 indicate that the baryonic mass assembly and star formation history is dominated by continuous rapid accretion of gas and internal secular evolution, rather than by major mergers. We use the Millennium Simulation to build new halo merger trees, and extract halo merger fractions and mass accretion rates. We find that even for halos not undergoing major mergers the mass accretion rates are plausibly sufficient to account for the high star formation rates observed in z~2 disks. On the other hand, the fraction of major mergers in the Millennium Simulation is sufficient to account for the number counts of submillimeter galaxies (SMGs), in support of observational evidence that these are major mergers. When following the fate of these two populations in the Millennium Simulation to z=0, we find that subsequent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
