Kinematic sub-populations in dwarf spheroidal galaxies
Ugur Ural (1), Mark I. Wilkinson (1), Andreas Koch (2), Gerard Gilmore, (3), Timothy C. Beers (4), Vasily Belokurov (3), N. Wyn Evans (3), Eva K., Grebel (5), Simon Vidrih (5), Daniel B. Zucker (3) ((1) University of, Leicester, (2) UCLA, (3) University of Cambridge

TL;DR
This study analyzes spectroscopic data of stars in the Canes Venatici I dwarf galaxy to assess claims of multiple stellar populations, finding no evidence for such sub-populations and emphasizing caution in their detection.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed analysis of stellar kinematics in CVnI, challenging previous claims of multiple populations and discussing the limitations of small sample sizes.
Findings
No evidence for kinematically distinct populations in CVnI
Mass estimate consistent with previous data
Detection of sub-populations in small samples is unreliable
Abstract
We present new spectroscopic data for twenty six stars in the recently-discovered Canes Venatici I (CVnI) dwarf spheroidal galaxy. We use these data to investigate the recent claim of the presence of two dynamically inconsistent stellar populations in this system (Ibata et al., 2006). We do not find evidence for kinematically distinct populations in our sample and we are able to obtain a mass estimate for CVnI that is consistent with all available data, including previously published data. We discuss possible differences between our sample and the earlier data set and study the general detectability of sub-populations in small kinematic samples. We conclude that in the absence of supporting observational evidence (for example, metallicity gradients), sub-populations in small kinematic samples (typically fewer than 100 stars) should be treated with extreme caution, as their detection…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
