On the hitting times of quantum versus random walks
Frederic Magniez, Ashwin Nayak, Peter C. Richter, and Miklos Santha

TL;DR
This paper introduces new classical and quantum hitting times, explores their relationships, and develops quantum algorithms for detection and finding problems with complexities tied to these hitting times.
Contribution
It defines new Monte Carlo type hitting times, establishes their relationships with existing definitions, and presents quantum algorithms leveraging these times for improved detection and finding tasks.
Findings
Quantum hitting time is proportional to the square root of classical hitting time.
For reversible ergodic Markov chains, quantum hitting time matches the order of classical hitting time's square root.
The new algorithms are simpler and potentially more efficient, with complexities related to the new quantum hitting times.
Abstract
In this paper we define new Monte Carlo type classical and quantum hitting times, and we prove several relationships among these and the already existing Las Vegas type definitions. In particular, we show that for some marked state the two types of hitting time are of the same order in both the classical and the quantum case. Further, we prove that for any reversible ergodic Markov chain , the quantum hitting time of the quantum analogue of has the same order as the square root of the classical hitting time of . We also investigate the (im)possibility of achieving a gap greater than quadratic using an alternative quantum walk. Finally, we present new quantum algorithms for the detection and finding problems. The complexities of both algorithms are related to the new, potentially smaller, quantum hitting times. The detection algorithm is based on phase estimation and is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
