Hazard processes and martingale hazard processes
Delia Coculescu, Ashkan Nikeghbali

TL;DR
This paper addresses open problems in credit risk modeling by analyzing hazard processes and martingale hazard processes, proving new properties, and clarifying their relationship for different classes of random times.
Contribution
It proves that continuous Azéma's supermartingales imply the default time avoids stopping times and corrects a conjecture about hazard processes equality, identifying pseudo-stopping times as key cases.
Findings
Continuous Azéma's supermartingales imply default times avoid stopping times.
The conjecture about hazard process equality is disproved and corrected.
Pseudo-stopping times are the most general class where hazard and martingale hazard processes are equal.
Abstract
In this paper, we provide a solution to two problems which have been open in default time modeling in credit risk. We first show that if is an arbitrary random (default) time such that its Az\'ema's supermartingale is continuous, then avoids stopping times. We then disprove a conjecture about the equality between the hazard process and the martingale hazard process, which first appeared in \cite{jenbrutk1}, and we show how it should be modified to become a theorem. The pseudo-stopping times, introduced in \cite{AshkanYor}, appear as the most general class of random times for which these two processes are equal. We also show that these two processes always differ when is an honest time.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCredit Risk and Financial Regulations · Banking stability, regulation, efficiency · Stochastic processes and financial applications
