Origin and evolution of the genetic code: The universal enigma
Eugene V. Koonin, Artem S. Novozhilov

TL;DR
This paper reviews theories on the origin and evolution of the genetic code, analyzing its robustness, possible evolutionary pathways, and the interplay of different hypotheses, highlighting the complexity and uncertainties involved.
Contribution
It synthesizes existing theories with mathematical analysis to explore how the genetic code could have evolved from randomness through error minimization and other factors.
Findings
The genetic code is highly robust to translational errors.
Multiple more robust codes could have evolved from a random code.
The evolution of the code likely involved a combination of frozen accident and error minimization.
Abstract
The genetic code is nearly universal, and the arrangement of the codons in the standard codon table is highly non-random. The three main concepts on origin and evolution of the code are the stereochemical theory; the coevolution theory; and the error minimization theory. These theories are not mutually exclusive and are also compatible with the frozen accident hypothesis. Mathematical analysis of the structure and possible evolutionary trajectories of the code shows that it is highly robust to translational error but there is a huge number of more robust codes, so that the standard code potentially could evolve from a random code via a short sequence of codon series reassignments. Thus, much of the evolution that led to the standard code can be interpreted as a combination of frozen accident with selection for translational error minimization although contributions from coevolution of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
