Comparison of low amplitude oscillatory shear in experimental and computational studies of model foams
Micah Lundberg, Kapilanjan Krishan, Ning Xu, Corey O'Hern, Michael, Dennin

TL;DR
This study compares experimental and computational low-amplitude oscillatory shear responses of model foams, revealing distinct flow regimes and transition behaviors with good agreement between methods.
Contribution
It provides a detailed characterization of the transition from solid- to liquid-like flow in foam models using combined experiments and simulations.
Findings
Velocity profiles are linear at low frequencies
Total phase shift scales as ω^3 at low frequencies
Transition to nonlinear velocity profiles at high frequencies
Abstract
A fundamental difference between fluids and solids is their response to applied shear. Solids possess static shear moduli, while fluids do not. Complex fluids such as foams display an intermediate response to shear with nontrivial frequency-dependent shear moduli. In this manuscript, we conduct coordinated experiments and numerical simulations of model foams subjected to boundary-driven oscillatory, planar shear. Our studies are performed on bubble rafts (experiments) and the bubble model (simulations) in 2D. We focus on the low-amplitude flow regime in which T1 bubble rearrangement events do not occur, yet the system transitions from solid- to liquid-like behavior as the driving frequency is increased. In both simulations and experiments, we observe two distinct flow regimes. At low frequencies , the velocity profile of the bubbles increases linearly with distance from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
