Comment to the paper D. V. Anchishkin and S. N. Yezhov "Thermalization in Heavy-ion Collisions"
K. A. Bugaev

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a previous work on thermalization in heavy-ion collisions, identifying major errors and arguing that the original claims are unfounded and based on mathematical mistakes and unsupported arguments.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of the prior study, clarifying misconceptions and highlighting errors that undermine its conclusions about thermalization.
Findings
The original paper's main result is not properly derived.
Identified mathematical mistakes in the previous work.
The claims about thermalization are unsupported by rigorous analysis.
Abstract
Here I discuss the major pitfalls and the most severe mistakes of the above mentioned paper. The thorough analysis shows that despite all the claims the present work has nothing to do with the thermalization process in relativistic heavy ion collisions. In contrast to the authors' beliefs I show that their main result is not derived, but is a combination of mathematical mistakes and hand waving arguments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHigh-Energy Particle Collisions Research · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
