Optimal weighting for false discovery rate control
Etienne Roquain (LPMA), Mark Van De Wiel

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new step-wise procedure for controlling the false discovery rate in multiple hypothesis testing, demonstrating improved power over existing weighted methods through theoretical proofs, simulations, and genomics data application.
Contribution
It proposes a novel, more powerful FDR control procedure that outperforms existing weighted Benjamini-Hochberg methods, especially with heterogeneous p-value distributions.
Findings
The new procedure controls FDR effectively in finite samples and asymptotically.
It shows superior power compared to traditional weighted BH procedures.
Application to genomics data demonstrates practical utility.
Abstract
How to weigh the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure? In the context of multiple hypothesis testing, we propose a new step-wise procedure that controls the false discovery rate (FDR) and we prove it to be more powerful than any weighted Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. Both finite-sample and asymptotic results are presented. Moreover, we illustrate good performance of our procedure in simulations and a genomics application. This work is particularly useful in the case of heterogeneous -value distributions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
