Disordered two-dimensional superconductors: roles of temperature and interaction strength
Felipe Mondaini (UFRJ), Thereza Paiva (UFRJ), Raimundo R. dos Santos, (UFRJ), and R. T. Scalettar (UC-Davis)

TL;DR
This study uses Quantum Monte Carlo simulations to explore how disorder and interaction strength affect superconductivity in a 2D Hubbard model, revealing critical impurity concentrations and temperature behaviors.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of the interplay between disorder, interaction strength, and superconductivity in a disordered 2D Hubbard model using finite-size scaling.
Findings
Superconductivity persists up to a critical impurity concentration that increases with interaction strength.
The zero-temperature gap peaks near a specific impurity fraction, indicating optimal disorder levels.
Critical temperature shows a maximum near a certain impurity concentration, increasing with interaction strength.
Abstract
We have considered the half-filled disordered attractive Hubbard model on a square lattice, in which the on-site attraction is switched off on a fraction of sites, while keeping a finite on the remaining ones. Through Quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) simulations for several values of and , and for system sizes ranging from to , we have calculated the configurational averages of the equal-time pair structure factor , and, for a more restricted set of variables, the helicity modulus, , as functions of temperature. Two finite-size scaling {\it ansatze} for have been used, one for zero-temperature and the other for finite temperatures. We have found that the system sustains superconductivity in the ground state up to a critical impurity concentration, , which increases with , at least up to U=4 (in units of the hopping energy).…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
