Comment on "Isotope effect in high-Tc superconductors" (D. R. Harshman, J. D. Dow, and A. T. Fiory, Physical Review B v.77, 024523 (2008))
A. S. Alexandrov, G. M. Zhao

TL;DR
This paper critiques a recent reinterpretation of oxygen isotope effects in cuprate superconductors, arguing it is mathematically and physically flawed, violating fundamental principles like the Anderson theorem and Coulomb law.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis demonstrating the inaccuracies and violations in the recent reinterpretation of isotope effects in high-Tc superconductors.
Findings
The reinterpretation violates the Anderson theorem.
It contradicts Coulomb law principles.
The critique clarifies the correct physical understanding.
Abstract
We show that the recent reinterpretation of oxygen isotope effects in cuprate superconductors by D. R. Harshman et al. is mathematically and physically incorrect violating the Anderson theorem and the Coulomb law.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSuperconducting Materials and Applications · Magnetic confinement fusion research · Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
