Characterisation of a silicon photomultiplier device for applications in liquid argon based neutrino physics and dark matter searches
P.K. Lightfoot, G.J. Barker, K. Mavrokoridis, Y.A. Ramachers, N.J.C., Spooner

TL;DR
This study evaluates a silicon photomultiplier's performance at cryogenic temperatures for liquid argon detectors, demonstrating stable gain, reduced dark count rate, and consistent photon detection efficiency, supporting its use in neutrino and dark matter experiments.
Contribution
The paper provides comprehensive characterization of a silicon photomultiplier at cryogenic temperatures, highlighting its stability and suitability for liquid argon particle physics applications.
Findings
Gain remains stable at 2.1E6 across temperatures.
Dark count rate decreases from 1MHz to 40Hz at -196°C.
Photon detection efficiency is temperature-invariant, at 25% for 460nm and 11% for 680nm.
Abstract
The performance of a silicon photomultiplier has been assessed at low temperature in order to evaluate its suitability as a scintillation readout device in liquid argon particle physics detectors. The gain, measured as 2.1E6 for a constant over-voltage of 4V was measured between 25degC and -196degC and found to be invariant with temperature, the corresponding single photoelectron dark count rate reducing from 1MHz to 40Hz respectively. Following multiple thermal cycles no deterioration in the device performance was observed. The photon detection efficiency (PDE) was assessed as a function of photon wavelength and temperature. For an over-voltage of 4V, the PDE, found again to be invariant with temperature, was measured as 25% for 460nm photons and 11% for 680nm photons. Device saturation due to high photon flux rate, observed both at room temperature and -196degC, was again found to be…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
