Core-collapse supernovae in low-metallicity environments and future all-sky transient surveys
D. R. Young, S. J. Smartt, S. Mattila, N. R. Tanvir, D. Bersier, K. C., Chambers, N. Kaiser, and J. L. Tonry

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the feasibility of detecting core-collapse supernovae in low-metallicity dwarf galaxies using various survey strategies, predicting detection rates for current and future all-sky transient surveys.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of supernova detection prospects in metal-poor environments across multiple survey platforms, including Monte-Carlo simulations and rate estimates.
Findings
Single 2m telescope can detect ~1.3 CCSNe/yr in low-metallicity galaxies.
Network of seven 2m telescopes could find ~9.3 CCSNe/yr but requires extensive time.
Future surveys like Pan-STARRS, PS1, PS4, and LSST could detect thousands of CCSNe annually in low-metallicity environments.
Abstract
Aims: Massive stars in low-metallicity environments may produce exotic explosions such as long-duration gamma-ray bursts and pair-instability supernovae when they die as core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe). Here we determine the feasibility of searching for these CCSNe in metal-poor dwarf galaxies using various survey strategies. Methods: We determine oxygen abundances and star-formation rates for all spectroscopically typed star-forming galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, Data Release 5, within z = 0.04. We then estimate the CCSN rates for sub-samples of galaxies with differing upper-metallicity limits. Using Monte-Carlo simulations we then predict the fraction of these CCSNe that we can expect to detect using different survey strategies. Results: Using a single 2m telescope (with a standard CCD camera) search we predict a detection rate of ~1.3 CCSNe/yr in galaxies with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
