A local hidden-variable model violating Bell's inequalities: a reply to Matzkin
R.N. Nijhoff

TL;DR
This paper critiques Matzkin's claim of a local hidden-variable model matching quantum predictions, arguing that an overlooked non-local element invalidates its locality.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis showing that Matzkin's model is not truly local due to an unacknowledged non-local hidden variable.
Findings
Matzkin's model claims to be local and quantum-equivalent.
Identification of a non-local hidden variable in the model.
The model's locality is invalidated by this non-local element.
Abstract
Recently, Matzkin claimed the construction of a hidden variable (HV) model which is both local and equivalent with the quantum-mechanical predictions. In this paper we will briefly present this HV model and argue, by identifying an extra non-local "hidden" HV, why this model is not local
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
