"Iff" is not expressible in independence-friendly logic
Allen L. Mann

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that independence-friendly logic lacks the property of expressing logical equivalence between formulas through a biconditional, unlike ordinary first-order logic.
Contribution
It proves that independence-friendly logic cannot express the equivalence of formulas with a single formula, highlighting a fundamental difference from first-order logic.
Findings
Independence-friendly logic does not have the property that iff is true in a structure.
This shows a key limitation of independence-friendly logic compared to first-order logic.
The result clarifies the expressive boundaries of independence-friendly logic.
Abstract
Ordinary first-order logic has the property that two formulas \phi and \psi have the same meaning in a structure if and only if the formula ``\phi iff \psi'' is true in the structure. We prove that independence-friendly logic does not have this property.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge · semigroups and automata theory
