Galaxy morphology in the LambdaCDM cosmology
O. H. Parry, V. R. Eke, C. S. Frenk

TL;DR
This study compares two galaxy formation models within the LambdaCDM framework, analyzing their predictions for galaxy morphology, formation processes, and the roles of mergers and disk instabilities, revealing both similarities and key differences.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of two prominent galaxy formation models, highlighting the impact of disk instabilities and merger histories on galaxy morphology predictions.
Findings
Both models produce realistic morphological mixes today.
Major mergers are not the main formation mechanism for most spheroids.
Ellipticals mainly form stars early, spirals assemble later.
Abstract
We investigate the origins of galaxy morphology (defined by bulge-to-total K-band luminosity) in the LambdaCDM cosmology using two galaxy formation models ,based on the Millennium simulation, by Bower et al. (the Durham model) and De Lucia & Blaizot (the MPA model). There are many similarities, but also fundamental disagreements in the predictions of the two models for galaxy morphology. For example, taking into account uncertainties in the available observational data, both produce a realistic morphological mix today, but its evolution is very different. A main cause of this and other differences is the treatment of disk instabilities which play a more prominent role in the Durham model. Our analysis confirms previous theoretical predictions that elliptical galaxies form most of their stars before the bulk of the galaxy is assembled. Spirals tend to have later `assembly' times as a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
