
TL;DR
This paper investigates whether low-mass WIMPs can explain DAMA's annual modulation signal without conflicting with other experiments, highlighting the importance of the channeling effect and suggesting future low-threshold detectors can test this parameter space.
Contribution
It identifies a viable parameter space for elastic WIMPs that explains DAMA results while remaining consistent with null experiments, emphasizing the role of channeling effects.
Findings
A region of WIMP mass 3-8 GeV fits DAMA and null results.
Channeling effect is crucial for the DAMA allowed region.
Inelastic scattering does not reconcile DAMA with other experiments.
Abstract
We study whether spin-independent scattering of weakly-interacting massive particles (WIMPs) with nuclei can account for the annual modulation signal reported by DAMA. We consider both elastic and inelastic scattering processes. We find that there is a region of WIMP parameter space which can simultaneously accommodate DAMA and the null results of CDMS, CRESST, and XENON. This region corresponds to an ordinary, elastically-scattering WIMP with a standard Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, a mass 3 GeV < m_{DM} <8 GeV, and a spin-independent cross section with nucleons 3 \times 10^{-41} cm^2 < \sigma_p^{SI} < 5 \times 10^{-39} cm^2. This new region of parameter space depends crucially on the recently discovered effect of channeling on the energy threshold for WIMP detection in the DAMA experiment; without the inclusion of this effect, the DAMA allowed region is essentially closed by null…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
