G\'eom\'etrie et cognition; l'exemple du continu
Bernard Teissier (IMJ)

TL;DR
This paper explores the distinction between truth and meaning in mathematics, proposing that perceptual neurophysiology underpins the foundational understanding of mathematical lines.
Contribution
It introduces a novel perspective linking neurophysiological findings to the foundational meaning of mathematical concepts, specifically the line.
Findings
Neurophysiological evidence supports the perceptual basis of the mathematical line.
A distinction between truth and meaning foundations in mathematics is proposed.
The perceptual system's role in mathematical understanding is emphasized.
Abstract
In this paper I propose the idea to establish a clear distinction between the foundations of truth and the foundations of meaning in Mathematics. I explore on the most basic example, the mathematical line, the possibility that the foundations of its meaning are provided by a protomathematical object resulting from the identification by our perceptual system of the visual line and the vestibular line, a point of view suggested by recent results of neurophysiology.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLinguistics and Discourse Analysis · Historical and Literary Studies · Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
