The physics of space and time III: Classification of space-time experiments and the twin paradox
J. H. Field

TL;DR
This paper introduces a clear nomenclature for describing space-time experiments in special relativity, clarifies the twin paradox, and attributes differential aging to relativistic velocity transformations rather than length contraction.
Contribution
It proposes a new notation and classification system for space-time experiments, providing a clearer understanding of relativistic effects and resolving misconceptions about the twin paradox.
Findings
Differential aging is caused by relativistic velocity transformations.
A new nomenclature clarifies the classification of space-time experiments.
The twin paradox is explained through relativistic velocity relations, not length contraction.
Abstract
A nomenclature for inertial frames and a notation for space and time coordinates is proposed to give an unambigous description of space-time experiments in special relativity. Of particular importance are the concepts of `base' and `travelling' frames and `primary' and `reciprocal' experiments. A detailed discussion of the twin paradox is presented. The physical basis of the differential aging effect is found to be a relativistic relative-velocity transformation relation, not, as hitherto supposed, the spurious `length contraction' effect.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories · Geophysics and Sensor Technology
