The Titius-Bode Law Revisited But Not Revived
Ivan Kotliarov

TL;DR
This paper critically examines a recent reformulation of the Titius-Bode law, demonstrating that the proposed hypothesis contains significant errors that undermine its validity for the Solar system and exoplanetary systems.
Contribution
It provides a detailed critique of the Poveda-Lara formulation, highlighting theoretical and computational mistakes that challenge its credibility.
Findings
The Poveda-Lara hypothesis is flawed due to serious mistakes.
The law does not reliably predict planetary distances in the Solar system.
The hypothesis is not applicable to the exoplanet system 55 Cancri.
Abstract
The present article gives a detailed analysis of the new formulation of Titius-Bode law by (Poveda, Lara 2008) and of the hypothesis that this law may exist in extra-solar planetary system. A thorough study of the correspondences between the calculated distances and the observed ones in the Solar system and in 55 Cancri is given. It is shown that Poveda-Lara hypothesis contains serious mistakes (both in theory and in calculations) that makes it unacceptable.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistorical Astronomy and Related Studies · History and Developments in Astronomy · Relativity and Gravitational Theory
