Implications of Two Type Ia Supernova Populations for Cosmological Measurements
Devdeep Sarkar (1), Alexandre Amblard (1), Asantha Cooray (1), and, Daniel E. Holz (2) ((1) UC Irvine, (2) LANL)

TL;DR
This paper investigates how two distinct populations of Type Ia supernovae can bias cosmological measurements, emphasizing the importance of controlling luminosity differences to improve dark energy parameter estimates.
Contribution
It quantifies the impact of prompt and delayed supernova populations on cosmological parameters and proposes constraints to mitigate biases in dark energy measurements.
Findings
Luminosity difference between populations is constrained to (4.5 ± 8.9)%
Ignoring a 0.025 mag difference biases dark energy EOS by ~1σ
Controlling luminosity difference to <0.025 mag prevents bias and reduces uncertainty
Abstract
Recent work suggests that Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are composed of two distinct populations: prompt and delayed. By explicitly incorporating properties of host galaxies, it may be possible to target and eliminate systematic differences between these two putative populations. However, any resulting {\em post}-calibration shift in luminosity between the components will cause a redshift-dependent systematic shift in the Hubble diagram. Utilizing an existing sample of 192 SNe Ia, we find that the average luminosity difference between prompt and delayed SNe is constrained to be . If the absolute difference between the two populations is 0.025 mag, and this is ignored when fitting for cosmological parameters, then the dark energy equation of state (EOS) determined from a sample of 2300 SNe Ia is biased at . By incorporating the possibility of a two-population…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
