Comparative statistics and origin of triple and quadruple stars
A. Tokovinin

TL;DR
This study compares the statistics and origins of triple and quadruple star systems, suggesting that rotationally-driven fragmentation, rather than cluster decay, explains their formation, with detailed analysis of their orbital properties.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of triple and quadruple stars, proposing a rotational fragmentation scenario as a key formation process, and highlights differences in their orbital period and mass ratio distributions.
Findings
Quadruple systems with similar masses and inner periods are common.
Inner period distributions are bimodal and similar in triples and quadruples.
Outer period and mass ratio distributions differ between triples and quadruples.
Abstract
The statistics of catalogued quadruple stars consisting of two binaries (hierarchy 2+2) is studied in comparison with triple stars, with respective sample sizes of 81 and 724. Seven representative quadruple systems are discussed in greater detail. The properties of multiple stars do not correspond to the products of dynamical decay of small clusters, hence the N-body dynamics is not the dominant process of their formation. On the other hand, rotationally-driven (cascade) fragmentation possibly followed by migration of inner and/or outer orbits to shorter periods is a promising scenario to explain the origin of triple and quadruple stars. Our main results are: (i) Quadruple systems of Epsilon Lyr type with similar masses and inner periods are common. (ii) The distributions of the inner periods in triple and quadruple stars are similar and bimodal. The inner mass ratios do not correlate…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
