Testing long-term earthquake forecasts: likelihood methods and error diagrams
Yan Y. Kagan

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new likelihood-based method for testing long-term earthquake forecasts, providing a more accurate and less simulation-dependent evaluation tool that includes error analysis and visualization techniques.
Contribution
It presents a novel likelihood scoring approach and error diagram visualization for assessing earthquake forecast effectiveness, applicable to spatial point process predictions.
Findings
The method effectively evaluates seismic forecasts in Pacific regions.
Forecast score distribution approaches Gaussian with more events.
Error diagrams can be biased with small event samples.
Abstract
We propose a new method to test the effectiveness of a spatial point process forecast based on a log-likelihood score for predicted point density and the information gain for events that actually occurred in the test period. The method largely avoids simulation use and allows us to calculate the information score for each event or set of events as well as the standard error of each forecast. As the number of predicted events increases, the score distribution approaches the Gaussian law. The degree of its similarity to the Gaussian distribution can be measured by the computed coefficients of skewness and kurtosis. To display the forecasted point density and the point events, we use an event concentration diagram or a variant of the Error Diagram (ED). We demonstrate the application of the method by using our long-term forecast of seismicity in two western Pacific regions. We compare…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
