Supervised functional classification: A theoretical remark and some comparisons
Amparo Baillo, Antonio Cuevas

TL;DR
This paper proves the consistency of the k-NN classifier for functional data within a broad Gaussian process family and compares its practical performance with other classifiers through simulations and real data analysis.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical proof of k-NN consistency for functional data and evaluates its practical effectiveness against other classifiers.
Findings
k-NN is consistent for Gaussian process functional data
No single classifier outperforms others universally
k-NN shows competitive practical performance
Abstract
The problem of supervised classification (or discrimination) with functional data is considered, with a special interest on the popular k-nearest neighbors (k-NN) classifier. First, relying on a recent result by Cerou and Guyader (2006), we prove the consistency of the k-NN classifier for functional data whose distribution belongs to a broad family of Gaussian processes with triangular covariance functions. Second, on a more practical side, we check the behavior of the k-NN method when compared with a few other functional classifiers. This is carried out through a small simulation study and the analysis of several real functional data sets. While no global "uniform" winner emerges from such comparisons, the overall performance of the k-NN method, together with its sound intuitive motivation and relative simplicity, suggests that it could represent a reasonable benchmark for the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Fault Detection and Control Systems
