AMAZE. I. The evolution of the mass-metallicity relation at z>3
R. Maiolino, T. Nagao, A. Grazian, F. Cocchia, A. Marconi, F., Mannucci, A. Cimatti, A. Pipino, S. Ballero, F. Calura, C. Chiappini, A., Fontana, G.L. Granato, F. Matteucci, G. Pastorini, L. Pentericci, G., Risaliti, M. Salvati, and L. Silva

TL;DR
This study investigates how the relationship between galaxy mass and metallicity evolves at redshifts greater than 3, revealing significant evolution and challenging existing hierarchical galaxy formation models.
Contribution
First measurement of the mass-metallicity relation at z>3 using deep near-IR spectroscopy and Spitzer data, showing stronger evolution than at lower redshifts.
Findings
Mass-metallicity relation evolves strongly at z~3.5.
Evolution is significant even in massive galaxies.
Low mass galaxies show more rapid metallicity evolution, indicating galaxy downsizing.
Abstract
We present initial results of an ESO-VLT large programme (AMAZE) aimed at determining the evolution of the mass-metallicity relation at z>3 by means of deep near-IR spectroscopy. Gas metallicities are measured, for an initial sample of nine star forming galaxies at z~3.5, by means of optical nebular lines redshifted into the near-IR. Stellar masses are accurately determined by using Spitzer-IRAC data, which sample the rest-frame near-IR stellar light in these distant galaxies. When compared with previous surveys, the mass-metallicity relation inferred at z~3.5 shows an evolution much stronger than observed at lower redshifts. The evolution is prominent even in massive galaxies, indicating that z~3 is an epoch of major action in terms of star formation and metal enrichment also for massive systems. There are also indications that the metallicity evolution of low mass galaxies is stronger…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
