Uncertainties and shortcomings of ground surface temperature histories derived from inversion of temperature logs
Andreas Hartmann, Volker Rath

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the uncertainties in deriving ground surface temperature histories from borehole data, emphasizing the importance of log depth and data quality for accurate climate reconstructions.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous assessment of the main uncertainty sources in temperature log inversion and highlights the importance of log depth and data noise.
Findings
Deeper logs (>3000 m) improve inversion accuracy for 1000-100000 year periods.
Heat production has minimal impact on inversion results.
Shallower logs (<300 m) are more affected by noise, limiting recent climate reconstructions.
Abstract
Analysing borehole temperature data in terms of ground surface history can add useful information to reconstructions of past climates. Therefore, a rigorous assessment of uncertainties and error sources is a necessary prerequisite for the meaningful interpretation of such ground surface temperature histories. This study analyses the most prominent sources of uncertainty. The diffusive nature of the process makes the inversion relatively robust against incomplete knowledge of the thermal diffusivity. Similarly the influence of heat production is small. It turns out that for investigations of the last 1000 to 100000 years the maximum depth of the temperature log is crucial. More than 3000 m are required for an optimal inversion. Reconstructions of the last one or two millennia require only modestly deep logs (>300 m) but suffer severely from noisy data.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
