Penetration depth, multiband superconductivity, and absence of muon-induced perturbation in superconducting PrOs$_{4}$Sb$_{12}$
Lei Shu, D. E. MacLaughlin, W. P. Beyermann, R. H. Heffner, G. D., Morris, O. O. Bernal, F. D. Callaghan, J. E. Sonier, W. M. Yuhasz, N. A., Frederick, and M. B. Maple

TL;DR
This study investigates the superconducting gap structure and muon perturbation effects in PrOs$_{4}$Sb$_{12}$, revealing a multiband nature and minimal muon influence, with results from $bc$SR and rf measurements showing complementary insights.
Contribution
It provides evidence for multiband superconductivity in PrOs$_{4}$Sb$_{12}$ and demonstrates negligible muon-induced perturbation, clarifying discrepancies between different measurement techniques.
Findings
$bc$SR indicates a temperature-independent penetration depth at low T.
rf measurements suggest point nodes in the superconducting gap.
Muon Knight shift shows minimal muon perturbation effects.
Abstract
Transverse-field muon spin rotation (SR) experiments in the heavy-fermion superconductor PrOsSb ( K) suggest that the superconducting penetration depth is temperature-independent at low temperatures, consistent with a gapped quasiparticle excitation spectrum. In contrast, radiofrequency (rf) inductive measurements yield a stronger temperature dependence of , indicative of point nodes in the gap. This discrepancy appears to be related to the multiband structure of PrOsSb. Muon Knight shift measurements in PrOsSb suggest that the perturbing effect of the muon charge on the neighboring Pr crystalline electric field is negligibly small, and therefore is unlikely to cause the difference between the SR and rf results.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
