The Red Sequence of High-Redshift Clusters: a Comparison with Cosmological Galaxy Formation Models
N. Menci (1), P. Rosati (2), R. Gobat (2), V. Strazzullo (3), A., Rettura (4), S. Mei (5), R. Demarco (4) ((1) INAF, Osserv. Astronomico di, Roma; (2) European Southern Observatory, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 2,, Garching, Germany; (3) National Radio Astronomy Observatory

TL;DR
This study compares semi-analytic galaxy formation models with observations of high-redshift galaxy clusters, revealing that models predict a well-defined red sequence at z=1.2 with properties similar to observations, highlighting the evolution of galaxy populations.
Contribution
The paper provides a detailed comparison between semi-analytic models and spectro-photometric observations of distant galaxy clusters, focusing on the properties and evolution of the red sequence at high redshift.
Findings
A well-defined, narrow red sequence exists at z=1.2 in models.
Cluster red sequence is more populated than the field at the same redshift.
Model predictions are generally consistent with observations, with some differences in scatter values.
Abstract
We compare the results from a semi-analytic model of galaxy formation with spectro-photometric observations of distant galaxy clusters observed in the range 0.8< z< 1.3. We investigate the properties of their red sequence (RS) galaxies and compare them with those of the field at the same redshift. In our model we find that i) a well-defined, narrow RS is obtained already by z= 1.2; this is found to be more populated than the field RS, analogously to what observed and predicted at z=0; ii) the predicted U-V rest-frame colors and scatter of the cluster RS at z=1.2 have average values of 1 and 0.15 respectively, with a cluster-to-cluster variance of 0.2 and 0.06, respectively. The scatter of the RS of cluster galaxies is around 5 times smaller than the corresponding field value; iii) when the RS galaxies are considered, the mass growth histories of field and cluster galaxies at z=1.2 are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStellar, planetary, and galactic studies · Astronomy and Astrophysical Research · Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
