Comparison between shape optimization and volumic level set approximation for geometrical functionals
T. Milcent

TL;DR
This paper compares shape optimization and volumic level set methods for differentiating curvature functionals, demonstrating their equivalence in results through theoretical analysis.
Contribution
It introduces a comparison framework for two differentiation approaches of curvature functionals, showing their equivalence.
Findings
Both approaches yield the same derivative results.
The methods are theoretically equivalent for curvature functionals.
Provides insights into the relationship between shape optimization and level set methods.
Abstract
We propose to differentiate a general curvature functional with two different approaches. In the first one we compute the derivative with the tools of shape optimization and in the second one we compute the derivative of a volumic approximation of the functional with respect to a level set function. We show that the two previous approaches give the same result.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Numerical Analysis Techniques · 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis · Computational Geometry and Mesh Generation
