Evidence for two distinct scales of current flow in polycrystalline Sm and Nd iron oxypnictides
A. Yamamoto, A. A. Polyanskii, J. Jiang, F. Kametani, C. Tarantini, F., Hunte, J. Jaroszynski, E. E. Hellstrom, P. J. Lee, A. Gurevich, D. C., Larbalestier, Z. A. Ren, J. Yang, X. L. Dong, W. Lu, Z. X. Zhao

TL;DR
This study reveals two distinct current flow scales in polycrystalline Sm and Nd iron oxypnictides, showing significant differences between intra- and intergranular current densities and their temperature dependences.
Contribution
It provides experimental evidence for two separate current flow regimes in polycrystalline iron oxypnictides, highlighting the difference in magnitude and temperature dependence.
Findings
Global currents exist over the whole sample.
Intragranular current density is about 5 MA/cm2 at 5 K.
Intergranular current density is 1000-10000 A/cm2, much lower than intragranular.
Abstract
Early studies have found quasi-reversible magnetization curves in polycrystalline bulk rare-earth iron oxypnictides that suggest either wide-spread obstacles to intergranular current or very weak vortex pinning. In the present study of polycrystalline samarium and neodymium rare-earth iron oxypnictide samples made by high pressure synthesis, the hysteretic magnetization is significantly enhanced. Magneto optical imaging and study of the field dependence of the remanent magnetization as a function of particle size both show that global currents over the whole sample do exist but that the intergranular and intragranular current densities have distinctively different temperature dependences and differ in magnitude by about 1000. Assuming that the highest current density loops are restricted to circulation only within grains leads to values of ~5 MA/cm2 at 5 K and self field, while…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
