Doping-insensitive density-of-states suppression in polycrystalline iron-based superconductor SmO$_{1-x}$F$_{x}$FeAs
H. W. Ou, Y. Zhang, J. F. Zhao, J. Wei, D. W. Shen, B. Zhou, L. X., Yang, F. Chen, M. Xu, C. He, R. H. Liu, M. Arita, K. Shimada, H. Namatame, M., Taniguchi, Y. Chen, X. H. Chen, and D. L. Feng

TL;DR
This study uses photoemission spectroscopy to analyze the density-of-states in SmO$_{1-x}$F$_x$FeAs superconductors, revealing doping-independent suppression features and suggesting a pseudogap related to superconductivity.
Contribution
It provides evidence of doping-insensitive density-of-states suppression and proposes a new interpretation of the pseudogap in iron-based superconductors.
Findings
Density-of-states suppression occurs with decreasing temperature in all samples.
Two characteristic energy scales (10meV and 80meV) are identified.
The 10meV suppression is attributed to a doping-independent pseudogap.
Abstract
We investigated the temperature dependence of the density-of-states in the iron-based superconductor SmO_1-xF_xFeAs (x=0, 0.12, 0.15, 0.2) with high resolution angle-integrated photoemission spectroscopy. The density-of-states suppression is observed with decreasing temperature in all samples, revealing two characteristic energy scales (10meV and 80meV). However, no obvious doping dependence is observed. We argue that the 10meV suppression is due to an anomalously doping-independent normal state pseudogap, which becomes the superconducting gap once in the superconducting state; and alert the possibility that the 80meV-scale suppression might be an artifact of the polycrystalline samples.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
