La fiabilit\'e des informations sur le web
Bernard Jacquemin (LIMSI), Aur\'elien Lauf (LIMSI), C\'eline Poudat, (LTCI), Martine Hurault-Plantet (LIMSI), Nicolas Auray (LTCI)

TL;DR
This paper analyzes how different types of contributors influence the quality and reliability of information on collaborative platforms like Wikipedia, highlighting the importance of contributor behavior in managing conflicting content.
Contribution
It provides an analysis of contributor roles in conflict resolution on Wikipedia, offering insights into information reliability in collaborative online environments.
Findings
Contributor behavior impacts article quality
Different contributor types influence conflict resolution
Insights aid navigation of variable information quality
Abstract
Online IR tools have to take into account new phenomena linked to the appearance of blogs, wiki and other collaborative publications. Among these collaborative sites, Wikipedia represents a crucial source of information. However, the quality of this information has been recently questionned. A better knowledge of the contributors' behaviors should help users navigate through information whose quality may vary from one source to another. In order to explore this idea, we present an analysis of the role of different types of contributors in the control of the publication of conflictual articles.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWikis in Education and Collaboration
