Two dimensional adelic analysis and cuspidal automorphic representations of GL(2)

TL;DR

This paper explores the connection between two-dimensional adelic analysis of elliptic curves and the theory of cuspidal automorphic representations of GL(2), aiming to relate these frameworks under the assumption of modularity.

Contribution

It establishes a conceptual link between two-dimensional adelic objects and cuspidal automorphic representations of GL(2) in the context of modular elliptic curves.

Findings

Mean-periodicity of boundary integrand implies L-function properties

Relation between two-dimensional adelic analysis and automorphic representations

Duality conjecture under modularity assumption

Abstract

Two dimensional adelic objects were introduced by I. Fesenko in his study of the Hasse zeta function associated to a regular model $\mathcal E$ of the elliptic curve $E$. The Hasse-Weil $L$-function $L(E,s)$ of $E$ appears in the denominator of the Hasse zeta function of $\mathcal E$. The two dimensional adelic analysis predicts that the integrand $h$ of the boundary term of the two dimensional zeta integral attached to $\mathcal E$ is mean-periodic. The mean-periodicity of $h$ implies the meromorphic continuation and the functional equation of $L(E,s)$. On the other hand, if $E$ is modular, several nice analytic properties of $L(E,s)$, in particular the analytic continuation and the functional equation, are obtained by the theory of the cuspical automorphic representation of GL(2) over the ordinary ring of adele (one dimensional adelic object). In this article we try to relate the theory of two dimensional adelic object to the theory of cuspidal automorphic representation of GL(2) over the one dimensional adelic object, under the assumption that $E$ is modular. Roughly speaking, they are dual each other.