The Structure of Classical Bulges And Pseudobulges: The Link Between Pseudobulges And Sersic Index
David B. Fisher, Niv Drory

TL;DR
This study reveals that pseudobulges and classical bulges differ significantly in structure, morphology, and formation processes, with pseudobulges showing lower Sersic indices, flatter shapes, and correlations with disk properties, indicating secular evolution.
Contribution
The paper establishes a clear link between bulge Sersic index and morphology, demonstrating bimodality and suggesting different formation mechanisms for pseudobulges and classical bulges.
Findings
Pseudobulges have Sersic index n<2, classical bulges have n>2.
Pseudobulges are more disk-like and flatter than classical bulges.
Sersic index in pseudobulges does not correlate with bulge-to-total ratio.
Abstract
In this paper we study the properties of pseudobulges (bulges that appear similar to disk galaxies) and classical bulges (bulges which appear similar to E-type galaxies) in bulge-disk decompositions. We show that the distribution of bulge Sersic indices is bimodal, and this bimodality correlates with the morphology of the bulge. Pseudobulges have n<2 and classical bulges have n>2 with little overlap. Also, pseudobulges do not follow the correlations of Sersic index with structural parameters or the photometric projections of the fundamental plane in the same way as classical bulges and elliptical galaxies do. We find that pseudobulges are systematically flatter than classical bulges and thus more disk-like in both their morphology and shape. We do not find significant differences between different bulge morphologies that we are collectively calling pseudobulges (nuclear spirals, nuclear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
