Criteria for Core-Collapse Supernova Explosions by the Neutrino Mechanism
Jeremiah W. Murphy (1,2), Adam Burrows (3,1) ((1) Steward, Observatory, University of Arizona, (2) Astronomy Department, University of, Washington, (3) Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University)

TL;DR
This study identifies a critical neutrino luminosity condition that determines supernova explosions, showing that multi-dimensional effects lower the threshold needed for explosion compared to 1D models.
Contribution
It introduces a critical-luminosity/mass-accretion-rate criterion for supernova explosions and compares 1D and 2D simulation results, highlighting the impact of dimensionality on explosion conditions.
Findings
Critical luminosity in 2D is about 70% of that in 1D.
Non-radial instabilities are key in 2D explosion dynamics.
Heating efficiency increases during explosion phases.
Abstract
We investigate the criteria for successful core-collapse supernova explosions by the neutrino mechanism. We find that a critical-luminosity/mass-accretion-rate condition distinguishes non-exploding from exploding models in hydrodynamic one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) simulations. We present 95 such simulations that parametrically explore the dependence on neutrino luminosity, mass accretion rate, resolution, and dimensionality. While radial oscillations mediate the transition between 1D accretion (non-exploding) and exploding simulations, the non-radial standing accretion shock instability characterizes 2D simulations. We find that it is useful to compare the average dwell time of matter in the gain region with the corresponding heating timescale, but that tracking the residence time distribution function of tracer particles better describes the complex flows in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
