A Logical Calculus To Intuitively And Logically Denote Number Systems
Pith Xie

TL;DR
This paper introduces a logical calculus to represent number systems, addressing limitations of traditional notations like continued fractions and Dedekind cuts by providing a more intuitive and logical framework.
Contribution
It develops a novel logical calculus that allows for the intuitive and logical representation of number systems, overcoming limitations of existing notations.
Findings
Continued fractions and base-b expansions fail to denote real numbers with proper logic.
Dedekind cuts and Cauchy sequences lack algebraic operation compatibility and intuition.
The proposed calculus successfully constructs a logical framework for number systems.
Abstract
Simple continued fractions, base-b expansions, Dedekind cuts and Cauchy sequences are common notations for number systems. In this note, first, it is proven that both simple continued fractions and base-b expansions fail to denote real numbers and thus lack logic; second, it is shown that Dedekind cuts and Cauchy sequences fail to join in algebraical operations and thus lack intuition; third, we construct a logical calculus and deduce numbers to intuitively and logically denote number systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis · History and Theory of Mathematics
