Postulates for measures of genuine multipartite correlations
Charles H. Bennett, Andrzej Grudka, Michal Horodecki, Pawel Horodecki,, Ryszard Horodecki

TL;DR
This paper establishes foundational postulates for measuring genuine multipartite correlations, critiques existing measures like covariance, and proposes a new candidate measure based on local bath work extraction.
Contribution
It introduces three postulates for genuine multipartite correlation measures, analyzes covariance's inadequacy, and proposes a novel measure based on local bath work extraction.
Findings
Covariance fails two postulates for genuine correlations
Proposed a new measure based on local bath work extraction
Degree of correlations offers partial characterization
Abstract
A lot of research has been done on multipartite correlations. However, it seems strange that there is no definition of so called genuine multipartite correlations. In this paper we propose three reasonable postulates which each measure or indicator of genuine multipartite correlations (or genuine multipartite entanglement) should satisfy. We also introduce degree of correlations which gives partial characterization of multipartite correlations. Then, we show that covariance does not satisfy two postulates and hence, it cannot be used as an indicator of genuine multipartite correlations. Finally, we propose candidate for a measure of genuine multipartite correlations based on the work that can be drawn from local bath by means of a multipartite state.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
