A comprehensive comparison of the Sun to other stars: searching for self-selection effects
Jose A. Robles, Charles H. Lineweaver, Daniel Grether, Chris Flynn,, Chas A. Egan, Michael B. Pracy, Johan Holmberg, Esko Gardner

TL;DR
This study compares the Sun to other stars across eleven properties related to habitability, finding it generally typical despite some differences, supporting the idea that no special stellar traits are necessary for life.
Contribution
It provides the most comprehensive statistical comparison of the Sun to other stars using multiple properties, clarifying its typicality in the context of habitability.
Findings
The Sun is more massive than about 95% of nearby stars.
Its orbit is less eccentric than 93% of similar stars.
Overall, the Sun's combined properties suggest it is a typical star.
Abstract
If the origin of life and the evolution of observers on a planet is favoured by atypical properties of a planet's host star, we would expect our Sun to be atypical with respect to such properties. The Sun has been described by previous studies as both typical and atypical. In an effort to reduce this ambiguity and quantify how typical the Sun is, we identify eleven maximally-independent properties that have plausible correlations with habitability, and that have been observed by, or can be derived from, sufficiently large, currently available and representative stellar surveys. By comparing solar values for the eleven properties, to the resultant stellar distributions, we make the most comprehensive comparison of the Sun to other stars. The two most atypical properties of the Sun are its mass and orbit. The Sun is more massive than 95 -/+ 2% of nearby stars and its orbit around the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
