Comment on "Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is 'incomplete'"

TL;DR

This paper critiques a recent article by highlighting that its conclusions are based on an invalid use of Dirac delta distributions, questioning the validity of its claims about quantum mechanics.

Contribution

It clarifies the mathematical errors in the referenced article, emphasizing the importance of correct distribution handling in quantum mechanics arguments.

Findings

Identifies improper use of Dirac delta-distributions in the criticized article

Highlights the impact of mathematical errors on conclusions about quantum mechanics

Reinforces the need for rigorous mathematical methods in theoretical physics

Abstract

This comment on the recently published article "Why Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen did not prove that quantum mechanics is 'incomplete'" (arXiv:0805.0217) by J.H.Field shows that some conclusions, made in the referred-to article, result from an invalid use of dirac delta-distributions.