Comment on `Nanoconfinement-enhanced conformational response of single DNA molecules to changes in ionic environment'
Madhavi Krishnan, Eugene P. Petrov

TL;DR
This paper challenges previous claims by arguing that DNA behavior in nanochannels at low ionic strength is better explained by entropic depletion theory rather than excluded volume effects, refining understanding of DNA conformational responses.
Contribution
It clarifies the role of excluded volume effects versus entropic depletion in DNA behavior within nanochannels at low ionic strength.
Findings
Excluded volume effects are not significant at low ionic strength.
DNA extension data align with Odijk's entropic depletion theory.
Revises previous interpretations of DNA conformational responses.
Abstract
In the present Comment we show that, contrary to the recent findings of Reisner et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 058302 (2007)], the excluded volume effect does not play an important role in determining DNA behavior in nanochannels at low ionic strength. We argue that the DNA extension data are described very well without the notion of an effective polymer width using the entropic depletion theory due to Odijk.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions · DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
