A low energy neutrino factory with non-magnetic detectors
Patrick Huber, Thomas Schwetz

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that non-magnetic detectors like water Cherenkov or liquid Argon can effectively contribute to low energy neutrino factory experiments by utilizing oscillation-enhanced signal-to-noise ratios and partial neutrino/anti-neutrino separation.
Contribution
It shows that precise neutrino/anti-neutrino separation is not essential, enabling the use of large, non-magnetic detectors for CP violation and mass hierarchy studies in neutrino factories.
Findings
Non-magnetic detectors can achieve 50-90% neutrino/anti-neutrino separation.
Oscillation enhances wrong sign muon detection without magnetic fields.
Large non-magnetic detectors can effectively explore CP violation and mass hierarchy.
Abstract
We show that a very precise neutrino/anti-neutrino event separation is not mandatory to cover the physics program of a low energy neutrino factory and thus non-magnetized detectors like water Cerenkov or liquid Argon detectors can be used. We point out, that oscillation itself strongly enhances the signal to noise ratio of a wrong sign muon search, provided there is sufficiently accurate neutrino energy reconstruction. Further, we argue that apart from a magnetic field, other means to distinguish neutrino from anti-neutrino events (at least statistically) can be explored. Combined with the fact that non-magnetic detectors potentially can be made very big, we show that modest neutrino/anti-neutrino separations at the level of 50% to 90% are sufficient to obtain good sensitivity to CP violation and the neutrino mass hierarchy for . These non-magnetized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
