Thick GEM versus thin GEM in two-phase argon avalanche detectors
A. Bondar, A. Buzulutskov, A. Grebenuk, D. Pavlyuchenko, Y. Tikhonov,, A. Breskin

TL;DR
This study compares thick and thin GEM multipliers in two-phase argon avalanche detectors, demonstrating their performance, stability, and noise characteristics for potential use in rare-event physics experiments.
Contribution
It provides the first direct comparison of thick and thin GEMs in two-phase argon detectors, highlighting the stable operation of G10-THGEMs and noise reduction techniques.
Findings
G10-THGEM achieved stable operation with gains up to 3000.
Double-THGEM and triple-GEM operated at low detection thresholds of 20 and 4 electrons.
Pulse-shape analysis effectively reduced noise levels to 0.007 Hz per cm².
Abstract
The performance of thick GEMs (THGEMs) was compared to that of thin GEMs in two-phase Ar avalanche detectors, in view of their potential application in coherent neutrino-nucleus scattering, dark-matter search and in other rare-event experiments. The detectors comprised a 1 cm thick liquid-Ar layer followed by either a double-THGEM or a triple-GEM multiplier, operated in the saturated vapor above the liquid phase. Three types of THGEMs were studied: those made of G10 and Kevlar and that with resistive electrodes (RETHGEM). Only the G10-made THGEM showed a stable performance in two-phase Ar with gains reaching 3000. Successful operation of two-phase Ar avalanche detectors with either thin- or thick-GEM multipliers was demonstrated at low detection thresholds, of 4 and 20 primary electrons respectively. Compared to the triple-GEM the double-THGEM multiplier yielded slower anode signals;…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
