Concentration, Spin and Shape of Dark Matter Haloes as a Function of the Cosmological Model: WMAP1, WMAP3 and WMAP5 results
Andrea V. Maccio' (MPIA), Aaron A. Dutton (UCSC), Frank C. van den, Bosch (MPIA)

TL;DR
This study examines how different cosmological parameters from WMAP data influence dark matter halo structures, revealing variations in concentration, shape, and spin that align with galaxy observations and proposing a new model for concentration-mass relations.
Contribution
It introduces a new model for the concentration-mass relation that fits simulation data across a wide mass range and compares halo properties across different WMAP cosmologies.
Findings
Concentration-mass relation is a power law with varying slope and zero point across cosmologies.
Halo shapes are more flattened in WMAP3 compared to WMAP1.
Halo spin parameter distribution is consistent across all three cosmologies.
Abstract
We investigate the effects of changes in the cosmological parameters between the WMAP 1st, 3rd, and 5th year results on the structure of dark matter haloes. We use a set of simulations that cover 5 decades in halo mass ranging from the scales of dwarf galaxies (V_c ~30 km/s) to clusters of galaxies (V_c ~ 1000 km/s). We find that the concentration mass relation is a power law in all three cosmologies. However the slope is shallower and the zero point is lower moving from WMAP1 to WMAP5 to WMAP3. For haloes of mass log(M_200/Msun) = 10, 12, and 14 the differences in the concentration parameter between WMAP1 and WMAP3 are a factor of 1.55, 1.41, and 1.29, respectively. As we show, this brings the central densities of dark matter haloes in good agreement with the central densities of dwarf and low surface brightness galaxies inferred from their rotation curves, for both the WMAP3 and WMAP5…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
