
TL;DR
This paper argues that advanced civilizations are more likely to evolve through optimization rather than expansion, challenging common assumptions and highlighting implications for SETI and future studies.
Contribution
It introduces toy models supporting an optimization-driven evolution of civilizations and critiques prevailing expansionist views in future and astrobiology research.
Findings
Optimization-driven models favor spatially compact civilizations
Contradictions exist in tech-optimist accounts of postbiological motivations
Implications for SETI strategies and future human studies
Abstract
It is argued that the "generic" evolutionary pathway of advanced technological civilizations are more likely to be optimization-driven than expansion-driven, in contrast to the prevailing opinions and attitudes in both future studies on one side and astrobiology/SETI studies on the other. Two toy-models of postbiological evolution of advanced technological civilizations are considered and several arguments supporting the optimization-driven, spatially compact model are briefly discussed. In addition, it is pointed out that there is a subtle contradiction in most of the tech-optimist and transhumanist accounts of future human/alien civilizations' motivations in its postbiological stages. This may have important ramifications for both practical SETI projects and the future (of humanity) studies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistorical and Contemporary Political Dynamics
