Compatibility of high-$\Delta \mathrm{m}^2$ $\nue$ and $\nuebar$ neutrino oscillation searches
The MiniBooNE Collaboration

TL;DR
This paper evaluates the compatibility of multiple neutrino oscillation experiments under a high-$ m extstyle igtriangleup m^2$ two-neutrino model, revealing limited agreement and highlighting excluded parameter regions.
Contribution
It provides a combined analysis of Bugey, KARMEN2, LSND, and MiniBooNE data within a high-$ m extstyle igtriangleup m^2$ framework, identifying the maximum compatibility and excluded regions.
Findings
LSND, KARMEN2, and MiniBooNE are 25.36% compatible.
Maximum combined compatibility is 3.94%.
Excluded regions are identified where compatibility is maximized.
Abstract
This article presents the compatibility of experimental data from neutrino oscillation experiments with a high- two-neutrino oscillation hypothesis. Data is provided by the Bugey, Karlsruhe Rutherford Medium Energy Neutrino Experiment 2 (KARMEN2), Los Alamos Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND), and MiniBooNE experiments. The LSND, KARMEN2, and MiniBooNE results are 25.36% compatible within a two-neutrino oscillation hypothesis. However, the point of maximal compatibility is found in a region that is excluded by the Bugey data. A joint analysis of all four experiments, performed in the region common to all data, finds a maximal compatibility of 3.94%. This result does not account for additions to the neutrino oscillation model from sources such as CP violation or sterile neutrinos.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
