Central and Satellite Colors in Galaxy Groups: A Comparison of the Halo Model and SDSS Group Catalogs
Ramin A. Skibba

TL;DR
This study compares galaxy color predictions from a halo model with actual SDSS group data, revealing that central galaxies are generally bluer than satellites at fixed luminosity but redder at fixed mass, with good overall agreement.
Contribution
It demonstrates the consistency of a halo-model-based prediction of galaxy colors with SDSS observations, highlighting the environmental dependence of galaxy color.
Findings
Central galaxies are bluer than satellites at fixed luminosity.
At fixed halo mass, centrals tend to be redder than satellites.
Model predictions agree well with SDSS data for most galaxy types.
Abstract
Current analytic and semi-analytic dark matter halo models distinguish between the central galaxy in a halo and the satellite galaxies in halo substructures. Using a recent halo-model description of the color dependence of galaxy clustering (Skibba & Sheth 2008), we investigate the colors of central and satellite galaxies predicted by the model and compare them to those of two galaxy group catalogs constructed from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (Yang et al. 2007, Berlind et al. 2006a). In the model, the environmental dependence of galaxy color is determined by that of halo mass, and the predicted color mark correlations were shown to be consistent with SDSS measurements. The model assumes that satellites tend to follow a color-magnitude sequence that approaches the red sequence at bright luminosities; the model's success suggests that bright satellites tend to be `red and dead' while the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
