How to Grow a Healthy Merger Tree
Jun Zhang, Onsi Fakhouri, Chung-Pei Ma (UC Berkeley)

TL;DR
This paper evaluates seven Monte Carlo algorithms for constructing dark matter halo merger trees, comparing their accuracy against the extended Press-Schechter formalism, and introduces three new algorithms that accurately reproduce the progenitor mass function across redshifts.
Contribution
The paper introduces three new Monte Carlo algorithms that accurately generate progenitor mass functions consistent with EPS at all redshifts, improving upon previous methods.
Findings
KW93 algorithm matches EPS progenitor mass function across redshifts
Three new algorithms reliably reproduce the progenitor mass function at each timestep
Differences among algorithms are demonstrated through additional statistical tests
Abstract
We investigate seven Monte Carlo algorithms -- four old and three new -- for constructing merger histories of dark matter halos using the extended Press-Schechter (EPS) formalism based on both the spherical and ellipsoidal collapse models. We compare, side-by-side, the algorithms' abilities at reproducing the analytic EPS conditional (or progenitor) mass function over a broad range of mass and redshift (z=0 to 15). Among the four old algorithms (Lacey & Cole 1993, Kauffmann & White 1993, Somerville & Kolatt 1999, Cole et al 2000), we find that only KW93 produces a progenitor mass function that is consistent with the EPS prediction for all look-back redshifts. The origins of the discrepancies in the other three algorithms are discussed. Our three new algorithms are designed to generate the correct progenitor mass function at each timestep. We show that this is a necessary and sufficient…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
